Which recent case limits or overturns Chevron deference, reducing agency power in administrative law?

Which recent case limits or overturns Chevron deference, reducing agency power in administrative law?

• A. FDR - Commonwealth Club Address (1932)
• B. Woodrow Wilson - Study of Public Administration (1887)
• C. Lyndon B. Johnson - Great Society Speech (1964)
• D. Loper Bright v. Raimondo (2024)

Answer: (D)

The main idea here is how courts treat an agency’s reading of the statutes it administers. Chevron deference lets courts defer to an agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute if that interpretation is reasonable. Loper Bright v. Raimondo (2024) is the recent Supreme Court case that tightens how that deference works, signaling a shift toward more judicial scrutiny of agency interpretations and limiting the power agencies can gain from ambiguous language. In this decision, the Court curtailed Chevron deference in the specific context before it, suggesting that when the statutory text is unclear or involves important policy stakes, courts should take a closer look at the statute themselves rather than default to the agency’s reading. This reduces the leverage agencies have to shape policy through broad interpretations of ambiguous statutes. The other options refer to older speeches or writings that do not address how Chevron deference operates today.

The main idea here is how courts treat an agency’s reading of the statutes it administers. Chevron deference lets courts defer to an agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute if that interpretation is reasonable. Loper Bright v. Raimondo (2024) is the recent Supreme Court case that tightens how that deference works, signaling a shift toward more judicial scrutiny of agency interpretations and limiting the power agencies can gain from ambiguous language. In this decision, the Court curtailed Chevron deference in the specific context before it, suggesting that when the statutory text is unclear or involves important policy stakes, courts should take a closer look at the statute themselves rather than default to the agency’s reading. This reduces the leverage agencies have to shape policy through broad interpretations of ambiguous statutes. The other options refer to older speeches or writings that do not address how Chevron deference operates today.